Gaithersburg: 301-670-7030
Baltimore: 410-769-5400
Frederick: 301-668-2100
Contact Us For Legal Help

Railroad Injury Blog

When Should An Injured Employee Give A Recorded Statement To The Railroad Claims Agent?

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

I am frequently asked the question of when an injured railroad employee should provide the Railroad’s Claims Agent with a recorded statement. The short answer is “when hell freezes over.”

The Real Purpose of a Recorded Statement

There is no advantage to an employee giving anyone from the Claims Department a recorded statement following an injury. The purpose of any recorded statement is merely to memorialize information that will be helpful to the Railroad in defending the case in court. Often, the Railroad’s Claims Agent will contact the employee and request a that a recorded statement be given following an injury. This is done under the guise of fact finding and information gathering. However, the real purpose of the recorded statement is to elicit information that can be used in court against the employee.

What You Say Can, and Will, Be Used Against You

I am blogging about this issue now because I have recently handled several cases in which recorded statements have severely hurt my clients’ cases. The Claims Agents are trained on the legal issues under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA). It is important to remember that in order to recover under the FELA, and employee must show that the Railroad was negligent or, stated differently, the Railroad failed to provide the injured employee with a reasonably safe place in which to work. At the time that a recorded statement is given, a full investigation obviously has not taken place. Information which may become available later will look fabricated if an employee denies facts that may become relevant later on after the case has been fully investigated. It is very damaging for a Jury to hear, in a railroad employees own words, information that contradicts what a subsequent investigation may reveal. The damage, in some cases, can be fatal.

The Claims Agent will also seek information that may help defend the case in other areas, such as information about prior injuries or pre-existing conditions which the Railroad may argue later are relevant to the issue of medical causation. In other words, the issue of whether or not the subject accident involving the injured employee was the cause of the damages alleged in a potential FELA claim.

So What IS an Injured Employee’s Obligation When Reporting an Injury?

The only obligation an injured railroad employee has is to complete the Railroad’s Injury Report. Those injury reports range from very detailed (ex. Those required by CSX Transportation), to very general (ex. Those required by Amtrak and others). The Injury Reports and the important sections thereof can be reviewed on my Legal App, which can be found by searching Matt Darby and Railroad in your smart phone’s App Store. Once that Injury Report is completed, the employee is under no obligation, legal or otherwise, to provide the Claims Department with a recorded statement (of any kind).

Why Sharing This Information Matters

Please help me get the word out by sharing this information with your fellow railroad workers. No one wants to be in the position of being injured on the Railroad. However, given the dangerous nature of the work, it is likely that at least some point during your career you may sustain an injury. This information could be the difference between a successful FELA Claim and one in which recovery may be limited.

By Matt Darby

Whistleblower Decision Illustrates Elements Necessary For A Successful Claim

Friday, March 30, 2012

Several weeks ago, I posted the summary of case decided by Judge Theresa C. Timlin of the U.S. Deparment of Labor that discussed the idea that an absence from work for a non-work related medical resaons is a protected activity under the FRSA. Last fall, she issued a decision in another Whistleblower case that illustrates the elements necessary for a successful claim. The decision is also important because it indicated that the FRSA can be violated even when disciplinary charges are dismissed.

On September 23, 2011, Judge Timlin, after a two day evidentiary hearing, issued an Order directing the Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (“PATH”) to pay a Railroader punitive damages and expunge from her personnel file any disciplinary and negative references concerning an on-the-job injury that was properly reported.

First, a little bit about the facts leading up to Judge Timlin’s involvement in the case. On April 1, 2009, the aggrieved Railroader was injured when she sat on a broken chair that collapsed. She filed an injury report right after the accident occurred. Shortly thereafter, the Railroad issued a letter notifying her that she was required to attend an investigative hearing to determine whether she had engaged in a rules violation for failing to inspect the chair prior to sitting on it. The investigative hearing was postponed and rescheduled several times. The charges against the Railroader were eventually dismissed.

Judge Timlin determined that the Railroad had violated the following elements of the Whistleblower Act. Each of these elements must be proven to recover under the Law.

Protected Activity

Judge Timlin determined that the Railroader had engaged in protected activity by filing the injury report. She indicated that “[T]hese reports are clearly methods by which an employee may notify an employer of a work-related personal injury or work related illness.” Judge Timlin also concluded that the Railroader, had in fact, sustained a personal injury.

Knowledge of Protected Activity

Judge Timlin indicated in her decision that a “decision-maker” who carries out the adverse action on behalf of the Railroad must be aware of the protected activity. It is no enough for the Railroad, as an entity, to know of the protected activity. This element was fulfilled as there was evidence that the Railroader’s supervisor, who brought the charges against her, was aware that the injury report was filed shortly after the accident.

Unfavorable Personnel Action

Judge Timlin determined that the Railroad had taken unfavorable personnel action against the Railroader despite the fact that the charges filed against her were ultimately dismissed. She indicated that the filing of such charges, and then dismissing them, “is likely to have a chilling effect on reasonable employees, who may be dissuaded from filing injury reports for fear of being charged with safety violations and being potentially disciplined.”

Contributing Factor

The Act requires that the protected activity must be a contributing factor to the unfavorable personnel action. Judge Timlin determined that the Railroader’s supervisor filed the charges against her because of “information provided in or lacking from the injury report.”

Judge Timlin summed up her decision that the Railroader had fulfilled the elements of her claim as follows: “Rather than investigating the matter first and filing charges only when a violation was substantiated, Respondent chose to file charges based on the information contained in the injury report. On the specific facts of this case, I find a clear causal connection between the filing of the Complainant’s injury report and the initiation of charges against her.”

By Matt Darby

Recent Posts


Tags


Archive

RSS

What Our Clients Say

Known for our unwavering commitment to clients, for our integrity, and for delivering the best results, our clients continue to refer their friends, families and neighbors to us for their legal needs.


"One year ago today I made the call to your office. The best decision I could make. I wanted to share with you how impressed I am with your staff and your professionalism."

Heather P.


"Craig did a great job representing me! He's the lawyer I have trusted with my legal needs because he's professional, knowledgeable, and keeps me informed about my case."

Jaclyn K.


"I would like to express my gratitude for your efforts and dedication for my disability case. It's has been quite a long and upsetting process but you have handled my case in an extremely competent and responsible manner."

Leo H.


"I have recommended Mr. Feldman to several of my friends and colleagues and have heard nothing but excellent reviews. He is the best lawyer I have ever used."

Martin


"I received the check today. I could not believe it until I saw the check. Thank you so much. You have improved my family's quality of life tenfold."

Mike F.


"These guys go above and beyond! They always have your best interest in mind."

Mike W.


"You have been kind throughout this process and I appreciate your professionalism as well as your gentle concern. Thanks for helping us and all the others who need your legal expertise. We are grateful."

Nancy F.


"Thanks to Mr. Shultz's aggressive and professional work ethic style I was able to receive the medical services and compensation pertaining to my case."

Navdeep C.


"I can honestly say this firm is simply TOP NOTCH! They not only have handled countless cases for my members that require their services, they also have gone well beyond their "scope" to help some of my folks in other areas of need. "

Rick H.


"The attention and professional care the staff has taken toward my needs has always been excellent. I have no complaints nor worries that my issues discussed are not addressed."

Tim T.


"I just got off the phone with Craig and let him know how thankful we are to you, him and Ken for all your efforts – you are all really terrific to work with!"

Val K.


Locations Throughout Maryland, Virginia & Washington DC

Gaithersburg Office

481 N. Frederick Avenue, Suite 300
Gaithersburg, MD 20877
301-670-7030 / 800-248-3352
Fax: 301-670-9492

Lutherville Office

1301 York Road, Suite 600
Lutherville, MD 21093
410-769-5400 / 800-248-3352
Fax: 410-769-9200

Frederick Office

30 W. Patrick Street, Suite 105
Frederick, MD 21701
301-668-2100 / 800-827-2667
Fax: 301-668-2000

Subscribe To Our Newsletter


TOP